This is a working overview of quality control, written for readers who want more than a one-paragraph summary but less than a textbook.
This page was last updated on 2025-10-24 and is reviewed periodically as new material appears.
System suitability testing is performed before and during analytical runs to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. Typical checks include retention time, peak area precision, resolution between critical pairs, tailing factor, and theoretical plate count. Acceptance criteria are set in the method or pharmacopeial monograph. If a suitability check fails, the run may be rejected and the instrument or sample preparation may need investigation. This practice helps prevent release of data from a system that has drifted out of control.
Quality control samples are inserted at intervals to monitor accuracy and precision throughout a batch. Blank samples detect contamination, while spiked samples assess recovery from the sample matrix. Calibration standards establish the relationship between detector response and concentration, and control samples are prepared independently from them whenever possible. Laboratories also participate in proficiency testing and maintain audit trails, instrument logs, and reagent records. Ongoing review of control charts can reveal trends before they cause out-of-specification results.
Method validation demonstrates that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Common validation parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and robustness. Accuracy reflects agreement with a reference value, while precision describes repeatability under defined conditions. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte in the presence of impurities or matrix components. Validation documents are reviewed before a method is used for routine testing or regulatory submissions.
Detection commonly uses ultraviolet-visible absorbance, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometry. Ultraviolet detection depends on molecular chromophores that absorb light at specific wavelengths. Mass spectrometry provides mass information and sensitive quantification, often after electrospray ionization. Before sample batches, performance checks examine resolution, elution time repeatability, peak symmetry, and plate count. Matrix effects and co-elution remain recognized uncertainties; formal validation studies and orthogonal detection help address them. Detector choice depends on analyte properties and required sensitivity.
High-performance liquid chromatography, or HPLC, separates dissolved compounds by passing a liquid mobile phase through a packed column. Components distribute differently between the stationary phase and the moving liquid, so they travel at different speeds and exit at different times. A detector records these eluting bands as peaks, and peak area or height relates to amount. The technique supports testing in pharmaceuticals, foods, environmental samples, and industrial chemicals. Quantification usually depends on calibration with known standards.
Several separation modes exist, including reversed-phase, normal-phase, ion-exchange, size-exclusion, and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. Reversed-phase uses a nonpolar stationary phase with a polar mobile phase and is widely applied to small organic molecules. Gradient elution changes mobile phase composition during the run, while isocratic elution keeps it constant. Column chemistry, particle size, temperature, flow rate, and mobile phase pH all influence retention and resolution. Method development selects conditions that separate analytes from matrix components and from each other.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Validation parameter | Accuracy | Closeness to a reference value. |
| Validation parameter | Precision | Repeatability or intermediate precision. |
| Validation parameter | Linearity | Proportional response across a range. |
| System suitability check | Resolution | Separation between adjacent peaks. |
| Quality control tool | Control chart | Tracks results over time for trends. |
Routine quality control monitors retention time shifts, baseline noise, system pressure, and peak shape. Trends can reveal column aging, mobile phase preparation errors, detector drift, or sample degradation. Corrective actions may include replacing the column, preparing fresh mobile phase, or recalibrating the detector. Stability testing often uses HPLC to measure parent compound loss and degradation product formation. Open questions remain about how accelerated stability results extrapolate to long-term storage under varied conditions.
Quality control for HPLC testing combines scheduled checks, documented procedures, and review of results. Before sample analysis, system suitability testing confirms that the instrument, column, and method meet predefined criteria. Common criteria include resolution between critical peaks, retention time precision, peak tailing, and theoretical plate count. Failure triggers investigation before results are reported. Records link raw data, calculations, instrument logs, and analyst identity to each batch, supporting audits and repeat analysis.
Separation modes differ by the chemistry of the stationary phase and the composition of the mobile phase. Reversed-phase testing uses a nonpolar column and polar solvents, making it common for pharmaceutical, environmental, and food analytes. Normal-phase testing uses a polar column and nonpolar solvents for compounds that are poorly retained in reversed-phase systems. Ion-exchange and ion-pair methods separate charged species, while size-exclusion methods sort molecules by hydrodynamic volume. Gradient elution changes solvent strength over time to resolve complex mixtures, and isocratic elution holds solvent composition constant for simpler assays.
Key performance measures include retention time, peak area, peak height, resolution, tailing factor, and plate count. Retention time helps identify a peak under fixed conditions, but confirmation often requires a second method or detector. Peak area and height relate to concentration through calibration curves, which may be linear or nonlinear depending on the detector response. Resolution describes separation between adjacent peaks, while tailing factor and plate count describe peak shape and column efficiency. Performance checks verify these values before and during a run to confirm that the instrument is performing within limits.
High-performance liquid chromatography testing separates components of a liquid sample by forcing a mobile phase through a packed column. The stationary phase inside the column interacts with analytes to different degrees, so each compound exits at a characteristic retention time. A pump delivers solvent at controlled flow and pressure, while an injector introduces a precise sample volume. Detectors such as ultraviolet-visible, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometric instruments record the separated bands. The resulting chromatogram provides qualitative and quantitative information about the mixture.
Documentation and traceability are central to regulated HPLC testing. Records typically include instrument logs, column history, mobile-phase preparation, sample preparation, injection sequences, raw chromatograms, and audit trails. Electronic systems may require user access controls, time-stamped changes, and backup procedures. Training records show that analysts are qualified for assigned methods. Audits and inspections check whether written procedures match actual practice and whether deviations are documented. These controls support reproducibility and allow results to be reconstructed if questions arise later.
Method validation establishes that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness, and solution stability. Accuracy reflects closeness to a reference value, while precision reflects agreement among repeated measurements. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte without interference from matrix components. Validation is documented through protocols and reports, and the required extent depends on the method's use and regulatory context.
Ansuvimab was developed by the Vaccine Research Center with support of the United States National Institutes of Health and the Defense Advanced Projects Agency. The heavy and light chain sequences of ansuvimab mAb were cloned into CHO cell lines to enable large-scale production of antibody product for use in humans. In early 2018, a Phase 1 clinical trial of ansuvimab's safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics was conducted by Dr. Martin Gaudinski within the Vaccine Research Center Clinical Trials Program that is led by Dr. Julie E. Ledgerwood. The study was performed in the United States at the NIH Clinical Center and tested single dose infusions of ansuvimab infused over 30 minutes. The study showed that ansuvimab was safe, had minimal side effects and had a half-life of 24 days. A license for ansuvimab was obtained by Ridgeback Biotherapeutics in 2018, from the National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Ansuvimab was given orphan drug status in May 2019 and March 2020.
Twin helical strands form the DNA backbone. Another double helix may be found tracing the spaces, or grooves, between the strands. These voids are adjacent to the base pairs and may provide a binding site. As the strands are not symmetrically located with respect to each other, the grooves are unequally sized. The major groove is 22 ångströms (2.2 nm) wide, while the minor groove is 12 Å (1.2 nm) in width. Due to the larger width of the major groove, the edges of the bases are more accessible in the major groove than in the minor groove. As a result, proteins such as transcription factors that can bind to specific sequences in double-stranded DNA usually make contact with the sides of the bases exposed in the major groove. This situation varies in unusual conformations of DNA within the cell (see below), but the major and minor grooves are always named to reflect the differences in width that would be seen if the DNA was twisted back into the ordinary B form.
As DNA printing and DNA assembly methods have allowed commercial gene synthesis to become progressively and exponentially cheaper over the past years, artificial gene synthesis acts as an engineering tool for creating and designing new DNA sequences and protein functions. Besides synthetic biology, various research areas like those involving heterologous gene expression, vaccine development, gene therapy and molecular engineering, are also impacted by changes in DNA printing technology. The methods used for DNA printing and assembly have also enabled the use of DNA as an information storage medium.
Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are the causative agents of the deadly food poisoning disease botulism, and could pose a major biological warfare threat due to their extreme toxicity and ease of production. They also serve as powerful tools to treat an ever expanding list of medical conditions that benefit from its paralytic properties, an example drug with BoNTs as the active ingredient is Botox. TBotulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are protein neurotoxins that are produced by the bacteria Clostridium. BoNTs are now largely being studied due to their ability to aid in chronic inflammatory diseases such as acne, multiple sclerosis, and for cosmetic purposes.
42. Adv Gerontol. 2004;14:105-13. [The influence of substances revealing geroprotective of spontaneous carcinogenesis in mice]. [Article in Russian] Popovich IG. The review presents the results of experimental studies conducted by the author. CBA, SHR, HER-2/neu and SAM mice revealed inhibition of age-related alterations in estrus function and spontaneous tumour development and showed life span extension under the influence of the pineal gland hormone Melatonin, synthetic peptide bioregulator Epitalon, delta-sleep-inducing peptide Deltaran, enterosorbent Aqualen and succinic acid containing preparation Neuronol (Noogam). The observed effect depended on the dose and conditions of administration, as well as genetic predisposition of the particular mice strains to tumour development.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
In the UK, a House of Commons Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs report on the horse meat incident was not critical of UK or Irish producers. It expressed concern that horsemeat contamination resulted from fraud and other criminal activity across the EU. Chair of the Committee, Anne McIntosh MP, said: "The evidence suggests a complex network of companies trading in and mislabelling beef or beef products which is fraudulent and illegal." The second major UK report on the horse meat incident was conducted by Professor Chris Elliott, the Director of the Institute for Global Food Security at Queen's University Belfast. In his independent report, he argues that food crime was at the heart of the horsemeat incident and makes a range of suggestions for how this could be tackled. "Industry, government and enforcement agencies should, as a precautionary principle, always put the needs of consumers above all other considerations, and this means giving food safety and food crime prevention—i.e. the deterrence of dishonest behaviour—absolute priority over other objectives."
Chromosome walking can be used for the purpose of cloning a gene. It does this by using the known gene’s markers that are closest and can therefore be used in techniques like isolating DNA sequences and aiding in the sequencing and cloning of the DNA of organisms. Chromosome walking is also useful when it comes to filling in the gaps that may be present in genomes by locating clones that overlap with a library clone end. This means that for chromosome walking to be carried out, it requires a clone library of a genomic format. This is why Vectorette PCR is one of the methods that can be used to create this library for chromosome walking to occur. Vectorette PCR comes in handy when it is necessary to obtain the regions that are both upstream and downstream and flank a sequence that is already known. By obtaining these regions, it provides the library of a genomic format that chromosome walking requires.
Caspases play the central role in the transduction of ER apoptotic signals. Caspases are proteins that are highly conserved, cysteine-dependent aspartate-specific proteases. There are two types of caspases: initiator caspases (caspases 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12) and effector caspases (caspases 3, 6, and 7). The activation of initiator caspases requires binding to specific oligomeric activator protein. These active initiator caspases activate the effector caspases through proteolytic cleavage. The active effector caspases then proteolytically degrade a host of intracellular proteins to carry out the cell death program. There also exists a caspase-independent apoptotic pathway that is mediated by AIF (apoptosis-inducing factor).
The following classification system for transmembrane solute transporters has been constructed in the TCDB. Three families of ABC exporters are defined by their evolutionary origins. ABC1 exporters evolved by intragenic triplication of a 2 TMS precursor (TMS = transmembrane segment. A "2 TMS" protein has 2 transmembrane segments) to give 6 TMS proteins. ABC2 exporters evolved by intragenic duplication of a 3 TMS precursor, and ABC3 exporters evolved from a 4 TMS precursor which duplicated either extragenicly to give two 4 TMS proteins, both required for transport function, or intragenicly to give 8 or 10 TMS proteins. The 10 TMS proteins appear to have two extra TMSs between the two 4 TMS repeat units. Most uptake systems (all except 3.A.1.21) are of the ABC2 type, divided into type I and type II by the way they handle nucleotides. A special subfamily of ABC2 importers called ECF use a separate subunit for substrate recognition. ABC1 (InterPro: IPR036640): ABC2 (InterPro: IPR000412 [partial]): ABC3 (InterPro: IPR003838):
Pharmacodynamics (PD) is the core principle of quantifying the effects of antagonists by measuring the drug's efficacy and safety. PD emphasises the relationship between the dose and response of a certain drug, which can be illustrated using a dose-response curve. Efficacy is the maximal effect (Emax) that an agonist can produce. As a receptor antagonist does not affect receptors after binding, it is said to have zero efficacy. A competitive antagonist does not affect the Emax of the agonist. This is because the effect of an agonist can be maximized by adding the dose of the agonist as the action of the antagonist is reversible. The maximum effect of the agonist can be achieved by adding the concentration of the agonist. A non-competitive antagonist(or Allosteric antagonist) lowers the Emax of an agonist. The Emax of an agonist is inversely proportional to the concentration of the antagonist, which means a higher concentration of antagonist results in a lower Emax. The maximal efficacy of agonists is reduced as the inhibition cannot be reversed by adding the agonist concentration.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Method validation is the documented process of showing that an HPLC procedure produces reliable results for a defined purpose. It examines parameters such as accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, and robustness. Regulators and quality systems often require validation before routine use.
System suitability is a set of checks run on the chromatographic system before sample analysis. It confirms that resolution, peak shape, retention time, and response meet predefined limits. Failure can invalidate the run and trigger corrective action.
Blank injections reveal peaks or baseline disturbances that come from solvents, reagents, or the instrument rather than the sample. They help distinguish contamination from actual analyte signals. Comparing blanks with sample runs supports accurate interpretation.
HPLC separates and quantifies compounds in a liquid sample. Detectors produce a response proportional to the amount of a compound passing through the flow cell. Identification by retention time requires comparison with a known standard.